AbleToTrain by Willing & Able

Lack of communication at work: how to recognize and address it

Organizations lose precious resources as a result of poor communication. According to one analysis, even for businesses with only 100 employees, a lack of communication costs the company an average of $420,000 every year. 

Profit losses, however, are merely one of the consequences of this organizational challenge. Poor communication in the workplace makes it tough to perform. Employees who work for organizations that do not prioritize efficient communication endure high levels of irritation and low levels of job satisfaction. 

A lack of employee acknowledgment and appreciation, for example, can make team members feel as if they are being taken for granted. When this occurs, businesses suffer in ways other than the bottom line. Organizational leaders struggle with workplace conflict, employee retention, productivity, and profitability as a result of inadequate communication.

To avoid this issue, learn more about what bad communication is, how to recognize the most prevalent communication challenges, and how to make good communication a part of your company’s work culture.

What exactly is poor communication?

Lack of communication occurs when information is shared incorrectly, hastily, or in an extremely complex manner. Messages become jumbled, and preconceptions take hold. As a result, many people may become dissatisfied, resulting in lower productivity and the dissolution of professional relationships.

There is no one type of person that communicates poorly in a company. It can occur at any level of a firm. Managers, for example, may communicate badly with those they direct, coworkers may misinterpret each other’s meanings, and employees may ineffectively report events to their employers.

Examples of poor communication

Poor workplace communication can manifest itself in a variety of ways. Some are more obvious than others, but they all affect employees and the organization as a whole. As a result, businesses must pinpoint their issues. Identifying the source of organizational problems is the first step toward resolving them.

Here are some of the most common causes of poor communication:

Rumors continue to be one of the most prominent examples of bad communication. Anyone in the firm, from the CEO to the newest interns, can be a source of rumors. Even if individuals don’t mean it that way, gossip is typically full of falsehoods and exaggerations. One example of out-of-control gossip is a coworker circulating a rumor about reorganization leading to future layoffs.

Written Communication: Face-to-face communication is becoming less popular as distance work becomes more common. People can misinterpret textual communication if they lack the vocal clues involved with just chatting to another human being. A manager’s email to an employee, for example, could be straightforward and clear, yet the employee could take the message as the management being furious and dissatisfied.

Insufficient Confirmation: No email is perfect. As a result, people must double-check the information they get. However, too many people skip this step, which leads to more misunderstandings. For example, if an employee sends an email asking a coworker for assistance with a project, the coworker should respond with an email confirming their availability. Otherwise, the first employee may believe that their coworker can promptly assist them.

Lack of Reviews: At the same time, if people do not examine the communications they send out, communication might become unclear. An email written in a hurry, for example, may have multiple mistakes and errors that would ordinarily be discovered if the sender just examined the email before sending it.

What factors contribute to poor communication?

The disadvantage of remote employment is that there are fewer in-person encounters. It has also contributed to a general lack of communication. Inadequate communication can be caused by a variety of factors, including poor leadership, unclear structure, and individual worker skills. Indeed, misconceptions may become widespread if a staff member in general has inadequate communication abilities.

Another key cause of bad communication in the workplace is a lack of emotional intelligence. Workers with high emotional intelligence develop strong relationships. They work as a team, which implies that they communicate well with one another. 

This is also true for executives, who must concentrate on increasing their own emotional intelligence in order to foster a workplace culture that strives to improve communication techniques at all times. Emotional intelligence aids in the understanding of others, enhancing social awareness.

Toxic working cultures can also make communication difficult. If leaders do not provide a safe environment for free communication, people will likely opt not to communicate at all. For example, a brilliant suggestion for increasing productivity is not shared by an employee because leaders have a problem with active listening. Or a worker may fail to notify their employer of a potential problem because they are afraid they will not be heard.

The consequences of poor communication

Poor communication has far-reaching effects in business and in life. Employee morale could suffer as a result. Workers who believe others do not grasp what they are attempting to convey frequently lack confidence and do not feel valued. 

This might lead to an increase in workplace negativity and mistrust. Employees may also feel as if their labor is useless. As a result, they will be dissatisfied with their positions, which will have an impact on employee retention.

It is stressful to work in an environment where people do not adequately express themselves. When communication breaks down, there is a lack of accountability and ownership of mistakes. As a result, blame-shifting, emotional weariness, isolation, and more significant communication issues may occur. As a result, team members are prevented from connecting, collaborating, and developing strong relationships, which is detrimental to the organization.