There is no separate bribery law in Bahrain. Bribery-related offenses are covered by Articles 186-193 and 417-427 of the Bahrain Penal Code, which was established by Decree Law No. 15/1976, as amended (the Penal Code). Bribery of public officials or bribery in the private sector (if it occurred after the 2013 revisions) may both be considered bribery offenses under the Penal Code’s bribery provisions.
This summary’s article references all pertain to the Penal Code.
The Penal Code makes no explicit definition of bribery.
Bribery is defined as a gift or privilege of any type, or a promise to be given one, to induce or reward the incorrect performance of a relevant function or activity, whether directly or indirectly.
The offenses applicable to public authorities are outlined in Articles 180 to 190 bis.
In the capacity of a public official, requesting or accepting (directly or indirectly) any gift or privilege in exchange for the performance or non-performance of an act (regardless of their intention) that is within the remit of their office, or that they believe is within the remit of their office (whether the gift is accepted before or after the act). (Chapters 186–189)
Bribery of a foreign (non-Bahrain) public official for performing or failing to perform an act in violation of their official obligations in order to retain or obtain a commercial benefit.
Bribery violations in the private sector are defined in Articles 417 to 422.
Any employee, director, or trustee who demands or accepts, directly or indirectly, a bribe in exchange for the performance or non-performance of an act to the damage of their employer or a private company (regardless of their motive) (whether the gift is accepted before or after the act) (Articles 418 and 419). Even if the act was not within the person’s duty to their employer, but they wrongly believed it was, this offence is found to have occurred (Article 420).
In general, criminal offenses under the Penal Code apply outside of Bahrain when one or more of the following conditions are met: the bribery offender or accomplice is a foreigner or Bahraini national (or former Bahraini national removed from citizenship in connection with the offence);
Bribery violations can be prosecuted against legal entities, private people, public employees, and anybody who aids or abets a bribery offense.
Although it is feasible, there are no particular regulations addressing a parent company’s culpability for a subsidiary’s bribery. The situations in which this could happen are fact-dependent. Some scenarios include: the subsidiary is established as a branch in Bahrain, and the principal parent is directly liable for the subsidiary’s actions; the subsidiary is established as a branch in Bahrain, and the principal parent is directly liable for the subsidiary’s acts; the subsidiary is established as a branch in Bahrain, and the principal parent
The parent company operates as an intermediary in the bribery scheme; or the parent firm participated in the bribe scheme directly or indirectly.
Yes, facilitation payments, no matter how modest, are deemed bribery if they fit the conditions.
There are no specific limitations on political or charitable contributions under the Penal Code.
Political donations are not now used in Bahrain, despite the fact that it is a parliamentary monarchy.
There are no specific provisions in the legislation that limit corporate hospitality. Corporate hospitality, on the other hand, may come under the broad definition of bribery. Bribery is defined as giving or accepting goods or advantages in exchange for money, which allows for a broad application of the term.
The criteria outlined in this note would most likely be used to determine if hospitality is a bribe.
Bribery offenses, on the other hand, have no defenses:
Before the matter is sent to the court, an accomplice or co-conspirator who self-reports or admits a bribery offense involving a public official will be considered a mitigating element in sentence. (See, for example, Article 193).
If a party self-reports a private bribery offense (one that does not involve a public official) before it is discovered, it will be considered a mitigating factor in punishment. (Articles 427, 428, 429, 429, 429, 429
The Office of the Public Prosecutor.
The National Audit Office (NAO) is a government agency that oversee (the NAO).
The General Directorate of Anti-Corruption and Economic and Electronic Security’s Anti-Corruption Directorate.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |